Thomas Massie Doesn't Deserve Your Support
His Loss to Jewish Money is an Injustice, but His Beliefs are a Deadly Danger to Our Race
Libertarian anti-Zionist congressman Thomas Massie lost his race yesterday thanks to $35 million in Jewish vote-buying money. That’s sad. It shows that the Jews have absolute power and opposing them on any basis whatsoever gets you crushed.
But we already knew that.
There are lots of analogous cases. The system sees every organic expression of Americans’ real political concerns as a threat. The alt-right got crushed after Charlottesville. Various right-wing people got crushed on January 6th. The goyish, pro-Palestine lefties got crushed.
What happened to Massie was unjust. It was unjust to him and to his supporters and indeed to all non-Jewish people who happen to be burdened with American citizenship.
But you shouldn’t support Massie. Not now, not if he runs for president in 2028.
Why? Because he isn’t a Nazi.
Massie is a libertarian. If I thought libertarianism could solve our issues, I would have become one a long time ago. I didn’t, because I think National Socialism is the only thing that can save the White Race and it’s civilization.
Which is why I follow Hitler.
We can admit that Massie has been done an injustice. We can even admit that he acted nobly given the limitations of his political understanding.
But we should not support him in any way. No money, no volunteered time, no votes, no cheering for him on the Internet.
Hitler says this quite explicitly:
“The future of a movement is conditioned by the fanaticism yes, the intolerance, with which its adherents uphold it as the sole correct movement, and push it past other formations of a similar sort.” (MK vol. 1, ch. 12)
In other words: “Be a Nazi, don’t praise libertarians”.
Further on, Hitler says:
"The greatness of every mighty organization embodying an idea in this world lies in the religious fanaticism and intolerance with which, fanatically convinced of its own right, it intolerantly imposes its will against all others. If an idea in itself is sound and, thus armed, takes up a struggle on this earth, it is unconquerable and every persecution will only add to its inner strength.
The greatness of Christianity did not lie in attempted negotiations for compromise with any similar philosophical opinions in the ancient world, but in its inexorable fanaticism in preaching and fighting for its own doctrine.”
Again, basically: “We NatSocs are right. People will agree with us, but we need to be firm. No stupid libertarians, no meritocrats, no republicans, no democrats, no commies.”
Does Massie represent a different political formation? Yes. His economics are libertarian, which means he does not believe in the fundamental priority of the community over the individual. We National Socialists aren’t just about throwing out the Jews, we are also about throwing out Jewish cultural distortions, including the Jewish economic pseudo-theories that support crony capitalism.
Massie is also not a racialist. I know, I know—I’ve been monomaniacally ranting about Jews lately and haven’t said much about race. But that doesn’t mean my beliefs have changed. They haven’t. “The benefit of folk and fatherland” being the final objective of all true political activity, it must always be remembered that our anti-Semitism stems from our love of our own race. If Massie won’t proclaim his support for pro-White policies, what use is he? Does he believe in ending mass-migration? Does he believe in affirming Whites’ sacred right to control our own homelands? Does he believe in eugenics, in ending race-mixing?
On the contrary, he has expressed support for migrants so long as it is “meritocratic”.
He represents a non-Nazi political idea and a non-Nazi political group.
Therefore, I refuse to support him.
Whenever someone stands for office, or even attempts to claim your support—that is, your money, time or endorsement—you should ask yourself, “what would this guy do to me and my friends and my beliefs if he were to gain dictatorial power?”. So—putting aside all questions of organization and practicality—lets assume that Massie did become dictator and was powerful enough to implement his program fully. What would that look like?
At best, it would be reactionary bullshit. We’d get a Sulla-style firming-up of the long-rotted 1789 Constitution. We’d get big concessions to private industry. Oh sure, he’d withdraw support from Israel. That would be splendid. But there would be no institutional way to prevent Jews from seizing control of our foreign policy and economy again in the long run because Massie is a reactionary not a revolutionary.
At worst, he would see racialists, socialists and especially National Socialists as rivals and therefore threats to his power. The logical thing for him to do would be to oppress us as much as possible. We have seen this phenomenon over and over again with politicians pretending to have “sympathy for our views” during elections, and then turning completely against us the moment they got into power. If you think the after-Charlottesville environment was bad, wait till you are at the mercy of an Americanist reactionary supported by big business and the duped masses… Wait till you get a reactionary whose regime is much less stable than even Trump’s because the dollar is even weaker, and the out-of-favor Jews are supporting leftist fanatics to overthrow him.
All that might well happen, and literally anything happening is better than continuing like this. All I’m saying is we need to prepare for this possible outcome. We need to organize as National Socialists, and not allow waste our time, thought and certainly not our money on people who oppose us on every issue save one.
His top priority won’t be throwing out Jews or oppressing the leftists. He will try to mollify the Jews and their dogs by repressing us.
This is what reactionaries do. They stifle the true folkish movement early on. They then cuck out on total, fanatical opposition to Jewish International Finance. Their regime might linger, but in the end it is overwhelmed by Jewish liberal-democracy-capitalism. In the end, all they achieve is denying their people their best chance to mount a true resistance.

If Massie runs for president, I won’t support him. In fact, I’ll vehemently oppose him. Naturally, I won’t support his Jew-backed rivals either.
I would only be willing to revise this position if Massie:
1) renounced his materialistic economic theory and publicly adopted socialism,
2) acknowledged the importance of race and eugenics in government policy,
3) declared his opposition to Jews in all cases and on a racial basis, not just because they’re “anti-American” or “Zionist” or whatever other cope he has for not being a principled Anti-Semite,
4) freed James Fields and compensated everyone else who has been oppressed in decades of Jewish by lawfare, doxing, Antifa street violence and so on,
5) surrounded himself by Nazi advisors of proven physical and moral bravery,
6) declared his readiness to liberate Europeans from NATO vassaldom or to incorporate them into a reorganized, trans-Atlantic Aryan State on an fair basis and with cultural protections,
7) declared his undying love and devotion to Adolf Hitler,
8) provided surety that he would follow through on all of his commitments by putting all of his personal wealth into his campaign.
That would be someone worth supporting.
Politics isn’t about what people believe so much as who they are organized behind.
Look, I get it. Sometimes I get really excited when I see someone making Jews mad. I certainly have made naive mistakes and supported people that I shouldn’t have. I gave $100 to Trump in 2016 and I repent for it to this day.
We Whites have gotten swept along in all kinds of things these last ten years. “So-and-so is super-based, he secretly believes what we do, we should support him.”. That’s been said of Trump, Paul Nehlen, Nick Fuentes, Kanye West, James Fishback… at one point in 2016 people were trying “to meme” obnoxious Canadian joke-guy Steven Crowder “into” a radical political voice.
The lesson here is that making Jews mad isn’t good enough. People like Massie should be looked at as symptoms of the weakening of Jewish Power, NOT as saviors… portents of ZOG’s inevitable doom, not potential leaders. It is fine to talk about these guys to introduce people to the real issues. I made a sick music video to accompany Ye’s “nigga Heil Hitler”. But we should never let ourselves or our comrades think that these people are worth supporting.
So while it is indeed encouraging that people like Massie are coming up, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. They don’t need our support. In fact, they would and do spurn it if it were offered.
The Jews cry about people because it’s a good negotiating tactic. They’ll feign spluttering rage until they get what they want, then they’ll get mad again and demand something else. C’est le Juif.
The good thing about all this is that when real Nazis come into view, the Jews’ whining about us will be indistinguishable from their whining about people like Massie. When that happens their days in power are numbered.




While I understand the perspective of supporting Massie in the primary, and I generally agree with it, anything beyond that, I agree with you. I truly believe libertarianism is more destructive to European civilization and societies than even generic white liberalism. I could give the reasons why, but I won't. While the jewish lobby did win this primary, libertarianism and missteps directly connected with libertarian ideology and immigration hurt massie as well. Long story short, he is heroic for fighting the jewisb power structure, but his worldview and ideology is absolute garbage. Fuck him.
Mr Conte goes hard and we thank him for it.